CI/CD Pipeline Implementation
A pipeline that verifies, builds once, promotes the same artefact, and proves the deployment worked.
Read moreA test suite fast and reliable enough that the team actually believes a red build.
The purpose of automated testing is not coverage; it is confidence to deploy on a Friday. A suite that takes forty minutes and fails intermittently produces less confidence than a focused suite that runs in four and never lies.
We shape the pyramid deliberately: many fast unit tests, a meaningful layer of integration tests around real boundaries, and a small number of end-to-end journeys covering what would genuinely embarrass you in production.
The suite that gates every commit stays under a few minutes through parallelism and sensible scoping.
Intermittent tests are quarantined and fixed, because tolerating them destroys trust in the whole suite.
Integration tests around real boundaries rather than mocks that only prove the mock works.
Required checks, coverage direction and security scanning enforced in the pipeline, not by convention.
Current suite reviewed for runtime, reliability and what it genuinely protects.
An agreed pyramid, with explicit decisions about what will not be tested automatically.
Tests written with your engineers, plus the fixtures and environments they depend on.
Wired into the pipeline as gates, with reporting that makes failures easy to diagnose.
We do not recommend a number. A team can reach eighty percent coverage while testing nothing that matters. Direction of travel and what is covered matter far more.
No. Exploratory testing finds problems automation never will. Automate the repetitive regression checks and free your testers for the rest.
Whatever fits your stack — Playwright, Vitest, Jest, pytest, k6. The strategy matters considerably more than the tool.
A pipeline that verifies, builds once, promotes the same artefact, and proves the deployment worked.
Read moreAn assessment of how your software actually reaches production, and a realistic plan to improve it.
Read moreService boundaries drawn around real business capabilities, and honest advice when a monolith is better.
Read moreWe will tell you what we would do, roughly what it costs, and whether it is worth doing yet.